<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 CSS and HTML support information available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/06/16/firefox-3-css-and-html-support-information-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/06/16/firefox-3-css-and-html-support-information-available/</link>
	<description>Updates on the march of progress. A weblog about web design, standards, web browsers, and the overall health of the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steuard</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/06/16/firefox-3-css-and-html-support-information-available/comment-page-1/#comment-4099</link>
		<dc:creator>Steuard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/06/16/firefox-3-css-and-html-support-information-available/#comment-4099</guid>
		<description>The &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; formatting issue (allowing authors to manually specify line breaks using character entities) in Firefox seems to be challenging to solve.  My understanding at the moment is that major changes to the basic structure of Gecko&#039;s parser would be necessary to fix this (or perhaps a tremendously ugly hack).  That&#039;s not to say that it won&#039;t happen, but it&#039;s an intimidating prospect (and it may well be too deep a change to accept until the next major version change: &lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt; Firefox 3.x).

But unfortunately, I think we&#039;re stuck with the &quot;strip newlines entirely&quot; behavior based on the HTML spec.  It&#039;s spelled out pretty explicitly there.  I quoted (and linked) the relevant bits when filing the &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358452&quot;&gt;currently active Bugzilla bug&lt;/a&gt; on this issue.  The discussion in that bug (and the ones it links to) may give you some idea of the issues involved if you&#039;re interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <code>title</code> formatting issue (allowing authors to manually specify line breaks using character entities) in Firefox seems to be challenging to solve.  My understanding at the moment is that major changes to the basic structure of Gecko&#8217;s parser would be necessary to fix this (or perhaps a tremendously ugly hack).  That&#8217;s not to say that it won&#8217;t happen, but it&#8217;s an intimidating prospect (and it may well be too deep a change to accept until the next major version change: <em>after</em> Firefox 3.x).</p>
<p>But unfortunately, I think we&#8217;re stuck with the &#8220;strip newlines entirely&#8221; behavior based on the <abbr title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</abbr> spec.  It&#8217;s spelled out pretty explicitly there.  I quoted (and linked) the relevant bits when filing the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358452">currently active Bugzilla bug</a> on this issue.  The discussion in that bug (and the ones it links to) may give you some idea of the issues involved if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using Mozilla Firefox 3.0 on Windows.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/06/16/firefox-3-css-and-html-support-information-available/comment-page-1/#comment-4097</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/06/16/firefox-3-css-and-html-support-information-available/#comment-4097</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great data already, thanks.

Even if HTML5 isn&#039;t anywhere near Candidate Recommendation, it defines a small edge case your tables treat as error: Expanded form of empty attributes.

Currently Gecko, WebKit and the latest Presto (Kestrel, Opera 9.5) represent  as readonly=&quot;&quot; (DOM and CSS). Trident says it&#039;s readonly=&quot;true&quot; (CSS only knows [readonly]).

Accroding to HTML5, the epmty readonly attribute becomes readonly=&quot;&quot; and stays with the empty string.

As said, this is true for every engine but IE. So I think your tables should treat readonly=&quot;&quot; as pass. As well as the IE7 mass testcase which tests for this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great data already, thanks.</p>
<p>Even if HTML5 isn&#8217;t anywhere near Candidate Recommendation, it defines a small edge case your tables treat as error: Expanded form of empty attributes.</p>
<p>Currently Gecko, WebKit and the latest Presto (Kestrel, Opera 9.5) represent  as readonly=&#8221;" (<acronym title="Document Object Model">DOM</acronym> and <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr>). Trident says it&#8217;s readonly=&#8221;true&#8221; (CSS only knows [readonly]).</p>
<p>Accroding to HTML5, the epmty readonly attribute becomes readonly=&#8221;" and stays with the empty string.</p>
<p>As said, this is true for every engine but <abbr title="Internet Explorer">IE</abbr>. So I think your tables should treat readonly=&#8221;" as pass. As well as the IE7 mass testcase which tests for this case.</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using Mozilla Firefox 3.0 on Windows.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
