<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 RC 1</title>
	<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/</link>
	<description>Updates on the march of progress. A weblog about web design, standards, web browsers, and the overall health of the Web.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Piggy</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4095</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4095</guid>
					<description>http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=628125

information in webKit is needed yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=628125'><abbr title="HyperText Transfer Protocol">http</abbr>://www.neowin.net/forum/index.<abbr title="PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor">php</abbr>?showtopic=628125</a></p>
<p>information in webKit is needed yes</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using (Not Specified) .</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4094</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4094</guid>
					<description>Very interesting! I was about to ask how you test all features.

It's a bit off topic, but even if Firefox 3 didn't bring as much CSS as I intially thought, it still brings a lot of improvments I'm very happy about. Good luck testing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! I was about to ask how you test all features.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit off topic, but even if Firefox 3 didn&#8217;t bring as much <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr> as I intially thought, it still brings a lot of improvments I&#8217;m very happy about. Good luck testing :)</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using (Not Specified) .</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ryan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4093</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4093</guid>
					<description>Ah I see. Well at least there is some information there that is useful to you anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I see. Well at least there is some information there that is useful to you anyway!</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using (Not Specified) .</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Hammond</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4092</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4092</guid>
					<description>The features you mentioned won't be included in the table yet anyway, since those CSS 3 specifications aren't yet at Candidate Recommendation status. But I do see some other fixes that will be relevant for my tables, so those will be included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The features you mentioned won&#8217;t be included in the table yet anyway, since those <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr> 3 specifications aren&#8217;t yet at Candidate Recommendation status. But I do see some other fixes that will be relevant for my tables, so those will be included.</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using (Not Specified) .</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ryan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4091</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webdevout.net/tidings/2008/05/26/firefox-3-rc-1/#comment-4091</guid>
					<description>Ah I see. Yes you are correct and the 3.1 version is planned for release before the end of the year. BUT as I understand it there may be a significant difference in the standard compatibility of the versions. I know that there are quite a few planned CSS changes to come for v3.1 including:

@font-face, font-stretch, text-shadow and quite a few other things. Have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Post1.9Planning&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; if your interested in a more complete list of the planned stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I see. Yes you are correct and the 3.1 version is planned for release before the end of the year. BUT as I understand it there may be a significant difference in the standard compatibility of the versions. I know that there are quite a few planned <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr> changes to come for v3.1 including:</p>
<p>@font-face, font-stretch, text-shadow and quite a few other things. Have a look at <a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Post1.9Planning">this</a> if your interested in a more complete list of the planned stuff.</p>
<p class="postdetails"><em>Posted using (Not Specified) .</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
